Informative Essay Islamic State Of Iraq And Levant

Informative Essay on Islamic State Introduction Islamic state of Iraq and Levant (ISIL) also rendered as Islamic state of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), also known as the Arabic phrase Da’esh and self-described as Islamic State was formed in April 2003 but was established in 2006, growing out of al- Qaeda in Iraq. It has since been abjured by al- Qaeda. Isis has a treasury of 2 billion making it the richest terrorist organization also it has become one of the main jihadist groups fighting government forces in Syria and Iraq because of it vast amount of fighters estimated from 7,000-12,000 with 3,000-5,000 being foreign fighters. The leader of ISIS is Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. Not many people know about but it is believed that he was born north of Baghdad, in 1971 and joined the armed rebellion against the US that erupted in Iraq soon after the 2003 US-led invasion. Who leads ISIS? Once a talented footballer in his local mosque Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is now the most wanted jihadist leader, head of Isis, is now deemed one of the most powerful jihadist leaders in the world. He took over as leader of Al-Qaeda in Iraq in 2010 after its former leaders Abu Musab al-Zarqawi who died in a 2006 US led airstrike and Abu Omar al-Baghdadi was killed in a 2010 attack by US and Iraqi troops. He declares himself as the â€Å"caliph† of Islam meaning an Islamic state led by a supreme religious and political leader and the ruler of 1.3 billion Muslims. Al – Baghdadi spent many of his formative years

Young Modulus Experiment Free Essays

Experiment 1: Young Modulus Title:Bending of beam and coefficient of elasticity. Objective: To study the relationship between load, span, width, height and deflection of a beam, places on two bearers and affected by a concentrated load at the centre. :To ascertain the coefficient of elasticity for aluminium, brass and steel. We will write a custom essay sample on Young Modulus Experiment or any similar topic only for you Order Now Results: Measurement of test specimen (a) For beam material – Steel | Length, L (mm)| Thickness, h (mm)| Width, b (mm)| 1st reading| 650| 3. 15| 18. 97| 2nd reading| 650| 3. 11| 19. 03| 3rd reading| 650| 3. 12| 18. 97| Average reading| 650| 3. 13| 18. 99| (b) For beam material – Aluminium Length, L (mm)| Thickness, h (mm)| Width, b (mm)| 1st reading| 650| 3. 25| 19. 15| 2nd reading| 650| 3. 21| 19. 23| 3rd reading| 650| 3. 21| 19. 18| Average reading| 650| 3. 22| 19. 19| (c) For beam material – Brass | Length, L (mm)| Thickness, h (mm)| Width, b (mm)| 1st reading| 650| 3. 31| 19. 05| 2nd reading| 650| 3. 34| 19. 20| 3rd reading| 650| 3. 35| 19. 09| Average reading| 650| 3. 33| 19. 11| Two simple supports end. (a) Deflection of test specimen [ Beam material-Steel ] Mass(gram)| Load (N)| Deflection #1 (mm)| Deflection #2 (mm)| Deflection #3 (mm)| Average Deflection (mm)| 100| 0. 981| 0. 5| 0. 45| 0. 48| 0. 43| 200| 1. 96| 0. 85| 0. 88| 0. 85| 0. 86| 300| 2. 94| 1. 30| 1. 32| 1. 38| 1. 33| 400| 3. 92| 1. 74| 1. 80| 1. 81| 1. 78| 500| 4. 91| 2. 20| 2. 24| 2. 25| 2. 23| (b) Deflection of test specimen [ Beam material-Aluminium ] Mass(gram)| Load (N)| Deflection #1 (mm)| Deflection #2 (mm)| Deflection #3 (mm)| Average Deflection (mm)| 100| 0. 981| 1. 18| 1. 15| 1. 16| 1. 16| 200| 1. 96| 2. 43| 2. 54| 2. 40| 2. 46| 300| 2. 94| 3. 72| 3. 67| 3. 72| 3. 70| 400| 3. 92| 4. 98| 5. 08| 5. 10| 5. 05| 500| 4. 91| 6. 07| 6. 20| 6. 15| 6. 14| (c) Deflection of test specimen [ Beam material- Brass ] Mass(gram)| Load (N)| Deflection #1 (mm)| Deflection #2 (mm)| Deflection #3 (mm)| Average Deflection (mm)| 100| 0. 981| 1. 02| 0. 97| 0. 90| 0. 96| 200| 1. 96| 1. 80| 1. 78| 1. 74| 1. 77| 300| 2. 94| 2. 67| 2. 78| 2. 66| 2. 70| 400| 3. 92| 3. 49| 3. 57| 3. 52| 3. 53| 500| 4. 91| 4. 37| 4. 41| 4. 37| 4. 41| One fixed end and one simple support end. (a) Deflection of test specimen [ Beam material-Steel ] Mass(gram)| Load (N)| Deflection #1 (mm)| Deflection #2 (mm)| Deflection #3 (mm)| Average Deflection (mm)| 100| 0. 981| 0. 26| 0. 23| 0. 27| 0. 25| 200| 1. 96| 0. 48| 0. 45| 0. 47| 0. 47| 300| 2. 94| 0. 69| 0. 70| 0. 70| 0. 0| 400| 3. 92| 0. 97| 0. 88| 0. 88| 0. 89| 500| 4. 91| 1. 15| 1. 12| 1. 12| 1. 13| (b) Deflection of test specimen [ Beam material-Aluminium ] Mass(gram)| Load (N)| Deflection #1 (mm)| Deflection #2 (mm)| Deflection #3 (mm)| Average Deflection (mm)| 100| 0. 981| 0. 60| 0. 67| 0. 69| 0. 65| 200| 1. 96| 1. 28| 1. 19| 1. 20| 1. 22| 300| 2. 94| 1. 80| 1. 80| 1. 82| 1. 81| 400| 3. 92| 2. 37| 2. 43| 2. 45| 2. 42| 500| 4. 91| 2. 97| 2. 98| 3. 01| 2. 99| (c) Deflection of test specimen [ Beam material-Brass ] Mass(gram)| Load (N)| Deflection #1 (mm)| Deflection #2 (mm)| Deflection #3 (mm)| Average Deflection (mm)| 100| 0. 81| 0. 47| 0. 42| 0. 48| 0. 46| 200| 1. 96| 0. 90| 0. 86| 0. 86| 0. 87| 300| 2. 94| 1. 30| 1. 28| 1. 30| 1. 29| 400| 3. 92| 1. 73| 1. 70| 1. 71| 1. 71| 500| 4. 91| 2. 14| 2. 14| 2. 13| 2. 14| Calculations: * Two simple supports end To calculate the moment of inertia : I = bh312 I = Moment of Inertia ( m4 ) b = Width of beam ( m ) h = Thickness of beam ( m ) To determine the beam Young modulus : E = F? (L348I) E = Young modulus ( Pa ) F = Force/load applied ( N ) ? = Deflection ( m ) L = Beam length ( m ) I = Moment of Inertia ( m4 ) F? = Slope of graph line deflection versus force ( N m-1 ) Beam material – Steel I = bh312 = 18. 99 ? 10-33. 13 ? 10-33 12 = 4. 853? 10 -11m4 E = F? (L348I) = 4. 9-0. 980. 00223-0. 00043(600? 10-3)3484. 853? 10-11 = 3. 920. 00180. 2162. 329 ? 10-9 = 201. 94 GPa Beam material – Aluminium I = bh312 = 19. 19 ? 10-33. 22 ? 10-3312 = 5. 339? 10 -11m4 E = F? (L348I) = 4. 9-0. 980. 00614-0. 00116(600? 10-3)3485. 339? 10-11 = 3. 920. 004980. 2162. 563 ? 10-9 = 66. 35 GPa Beam material – Brass I = bh312 = 19. 11 ? 10-33. 33 ? 10-3312 = 5. 880? 10 -11m4 E = F? (L348I) = 1. 962-0. 9810. 00177-0. 00096(600? 10-3)3485. 880? 10-11 = 0. 9810. 000810. 2162. 822 ? 0-9 = 92. 69GPa * One fixed end and one simple support end I = bh312 I = Moment of Inertia ( m4 ) b = Width of beam ( m ) h = Thickness of beam ( m ) E = F? (3. 5L3384I) E = Young modulus ( Pa ) F = Force/load applied ( N ) ? = Deflection ( m ) L = Beam length ( m ) I = Moment of Inertia ( m4 ) F ? = Slope of graph line deflection versus force ( N m-1 ) Beam material – S teel I = bh312 = 18. 99? 10-33. 13? 10-3312 = 4. 853? 10 -11m4 E = F? (3. 5L3384I) = 4. 91-0. 9810. 00113-0. 000253. 5(600? 10-3)33844. 853? 10-11 = 3. 9290. 000880. 7561. 86 ? 10-8 = 181. 47 GPa Beam material – Aluminium I = bh312 = 19. 19? 10-33. 22? 10-3312 = 5. 339? 10 -11m4 E = F? (3. 5L3384I) = 4. 91-0. 9810. 00299-0. 000653. 5(600? 10-3)33845. 339? 10-11 = 3. 9290. 002340. 7562. 05 ? 10-8 = 61. 92 GPa Beam material – Brass I = bh312 = 19. 11? 10-33. 33? 10-3312 = 5. 880? 10 -11m4 E = F? (3. 5L3384I) = 4. 905-0. 9810. 00214-0. 000463. 5(600? 10-3)33845. 880? 10-11 = 3. 9240. 001680. 7562. 26 ? 10-8 = 78. 13GPa Theoretical value for young modulus of Steel = 200GPa Theoretical value for young modulus of Aluminium = 69GPa Theoretical value for young modulus of Brasses = 100-125GPa Discussion : Based on the results, the experimental young modulus for Steel is 201. 94 GPa by using two simple supports end. Besides that, the experimental young modulus for Aluminium is 66. 35 GPa and for Brass is 92. 69 GPa. On the other hand, when the test is carried out by using one fixed end and one simple support end, the experimental young modulus for Steel is 181. 47 GPa, Aluminium is 66. 35 GPa and Brass is 92. 69 GPa. Based on the results from the both method, the coefficient of elasticity for Aluminium is the highest among Steel and Brass as it has the lowest value of young modulus. By comparing with the theoretical young modulus for Steel, Aluminium and Brass, the experimental young modulus for specimen by using two simple supports end is more accurate than using one fixed end and one simple support end. This is because when the beam is tighten only at one side, it will causes the beam to deflect unequally at both side. Thus, the dial gauge readings recorded will be inaccurate. There are some factors that may affect the experimental results to be inaccurate when this experiment is carried out. One of the factors that lead to inaccurate results is because of the atmosphere around the laboratory. The strong air from the air-conditioner will cause the load to be unstable and shaking when the reading is taken. Thus, the readings in the dial gauge will be changing as the load is moving. Besides that, misalignment error will also affect the experimental results to be inaccurate. The dial gauge is not placed to the center of the test specimen. This is important because the deflection of a beam placed on two bearers will be affected by a concentrated load at the centre. Moreover, parallax error may be occur when adjusting the height of the gauge so that the needle touched the test specimen. This error occurs because different people have different viewing of the measurement at an angle. Furthermore, the dial gauge must be set to 0. 00mm every time the load hanger is mount on the center of the test specimen. This steps need to be done before the readings is taken so that the results will not be interfere by the previous experimental results. The readings by the dial gauge must be taken when it is already fixed and stabilize. Therefore, softly tap on the dial gauge until the reading did not change to ensure that the load had already stabilize before the dial gauge reading is recorded. Conclusion : When the width and the height of the beam increases, the moment of inertia calculated will increase. Besides that, when the load and span increases, the deflection of a beam will also increases. This shows that the load and span is directly perpendicular to the deflection of a beam. Based on the results from both method, the coefficient of elasticity is increasing from steel, brass and aluminium. How to cite Young Modulus Experiment, Papers

BRIC Simply Implies the Combination of Few Countries

Question: Discuss about the Portfolio. Answer: Introduction: Literature Review BRIC simply implies the combination of few countries, which are Russia, China, Brazil and India. The future economy of the entire world depends on the development of these four countries (Stuenkel 2014). All the four countries have huge population and they are craving for growth, which has already started to reorganize the entire global commerce. They have young peoples who are concentrated in main cities and can impel this growth into a positive direction. However, the growing aspects of the start-ups and middle class are down in these BRIC countries. The domestic concern must be improved to provide growth in long term, strengths of investment and complement their exports. The average earning of the 800 million residents in the BRIC countries should have exceeded $ 3000 by the end of 2016. This should have effect on many industries like mobile phone, automobile, computers and many more. If income rises then it will also result in increased number of individuals having high net worth (Keukeleire and Hooijmaaijers 2014). Another factor is required to consider for supporting the market is profitability of the corporate. Profits of the corporate in BRIC countries has been consistently high during the past decade which was due to perfect corporate restructuring, reducing the level of borrowing and improving the corporate governance quality. In future if the recent problems in the credit market dont affect the growth of entire world in a very noteworthy manner then it is believed that the growth of Brazil will not be hampered significantly even though there is short term volatility in the market. In the mean time, Indias stock market has been able to reach highest levels (Cowan et al. 2014). It was expected that GDP of India and the earning of its corporate would slow down as its enters 2016 as various monetary and fiscal policy initiatives will be made to keep the inflation level under control. However, if long-term view is taken then Indian market will be slightly volatile during short term. The equity valuation of Chinese has shown upwards movements recently. However, higher valuation is expected seeing the growth of earnings in China (Frank 2013). The mergers, currency appreciation, acquisition and implementation of various plans for management incentive together with tax planning have been able to support Chinese in itiatives. The negative factor for China is its increasing trade surplus with Europe and china. Russia has suffered in the middle of the year due to turmoil in the market and no good performance in the beginning of the year to boost its value (Brtsch and Papa 2013). Therefore, most of the Russian stock has been valued at a moderate rate like shares of Lukoil and Gazprom was valued relatively low even when both of the companies have higher long-term valuation of oil than Petrobras, a Brazilian company. The key factor of Russia is the prices of oil and is unlikely to collapse but for some stock market has been trading at an average level. Forecast of the GDP of the counties of BRIC during the year 2009 to 2015 was roughly US $ 19.2 turn with an export of US $ 5.4 trn, which helps in boosting the domestic growth and creation of a new customer generation. There was a time when the growth rate of US and Europe was slowing down then BRIC countries provided massive growth opportunity for companies to penetrate the virgin markets at a large scale (Frank 2013). The growth of Chinese and Indian economy have been boosted by export and investment in manufacturing products which is largely different from the full of resource Russia and to some extent to Brazil. Therefore, any approach to exploit the BRIC growth must be accounted for in assessing the risk faced by these countries like risks in the stability of oil price (Cowan et al. 2014).. Financial market immaturity and pressure of inflation in china is also to be analyzed by the researcher. References Brtsch, C. and Papa, M., 2013. Deconstructing the BRICS: Bargaining Coalition, Imagined Community, or Geopolitical Fad?.The Chinese Journal of International Politics, p.pot009. Cowan, W.N., Chang, T., Inglesi-Lotz, R. and Gupta, R., 2014. The nexus of electricity consumption, economic growth and CO 2 emissions in the BRICS countries.Energy Policy,66, pp.359-368. Frank, W.P., 2013. International Business Challenge: Does Adding South Africa Finally Make the BRIC Countries Relevant?.Journal of International Business Research,12(1), p.1. Keukeleire, S. and Hooijmaaijers, B., 2014. The BRICS and Other Emerging Power Alliances and Multilateral Organizations in the Asia Pacific and the Global South: Challenges for the European Union and Its View on Multilateralism.JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies,52(3), pp.582-599. Stuenkel, O., 2013. The financial crisis, contested legitimacy, and the genesis of intra-BRICS cooperation.Global Governance,19(4), pp.611-630.